Joined
·
2,778 Posts

With a 380 HP Ecoboost this thing is just plain sweet!
3.6 liter Ford Ecoboost V6 will give that vehicle 30 miles to the gallon and over 300 horsepower. I like a 5.9 Cummins if im dragging a 20 foot hydro sport to the salt but for a utility vehicle give me the Ford. And ill still het my boat in the water.One word - diesel.
I get 20 mpg with my 2004 Dodge Ram 3500 2X4 and if it were a gas vehicle it would get maybe 12.
I love me a diesel.
Oh yea, it did a 15 second 1/4 mile at Rockingham in 2006 and I beat a new Ram Hemi by a full second. It isn't stock but the add ons were less than $1K and that's with all the proper guages.
Plus I get to blow smoke into the windows of people I see texting and driving-I changed the exhaust so it exits in front of the right passenger tire![]()
There is truth here. The problem with Turbo cars is people dont realise they have their own maintenanve schedule and are very sensitive to it. That engine however, in my ownership, would only ever see non ethanol fuel, and pennzoil ultra oil.when you combine small cubic inches, gas, turbos and modern emissions junk with bad gas, you end up with a nice 80k mile truck that is someones 100k mile moneypit. NO way will it have longevity....
I may be wrong but that whole flex fuel premise is based on fuel that's up to 15% ethanol. In my area you can get non ethanol at a few stations but it's all premium and costly. It's still all I would run in that Ford v6 even at about a dime more/gal.There is truth here. The problem with Turbo cars is people dont realise they have their own maintenanve schedule and are very sensitive to it. That engine however, in my ownership, would only ever see non ethanol fuel, and pennzoil ultra oil.
I'm pretty sure that it's bad for all enginesWould the 10%+ ethanol fuel have the same ill effects on flex fuel vehicles?