Joined
·
3,625 Posts
Yes, stick your head in the sand and utter political nonsense, that will do you a lot of good as the environment is destroyed around you. The scientist's will have the last laugh, unfortunately it will be bittersweet.It's Newsweek. They scare you to death about the oceans but our presidente is absolutely nothing to be concerned about.
Liberal rag. It brings out all the world is going to end soon because you don't walk or ride a bicycle, and eat dirt clowns.
Let me guess....Dr's office.
And this has never happened before in the history of the earth or nothing can possibly adapt to a changing environment? That's where I get off the circus train.I saw it as a sidebar link in another article. The projections are worse than I have seen in other articles, but there is definitely cause for concern. The pH has changed and the level has risen.
I call it common sense. The earth has changed drastically throughout it's history with meteor strikes, volcanos, the warming and cooling of the earth, ocean currents shifting which cause weather pattern changes and sometimes complete climate change. We have jungle that was once desert and desert that was once jungle. I live a good hour drive from the coast yet when I dig a well on this place I pull up not only burned wood from 30 feet in the ground but oyster shells from 50. Rising oceans? Rising to the level where they once were maybe? I don't consider that catastrophic. It's happened before obviously. All that coal in the West Virginia hills.....came from the decomposition of SALT WATER marsh grass. The earth does what it needs to do and man isn't going to alter that or cause it to change.Yes, stick your head in the sand and utter political nonsense, that will do you a lot of good as the environment is destroyed around you. The scientist's will have the last laugh, unfortunately it will be bittersweet.
The evidence indicates that what happened during the recovery from the pH change was pretty catastrophic. A rise in sea level shrinks the continents at the edges, which is where a bunch of humans live and built infrastructure they intended to keep dry. Sure, it may be recoverable but at great cost. A lot of evidence points to this being at least partially caused by conditions we have created, which is what makes it different than past similar events.And this has never happened before in the history of the earth or nothing can possibly adapt to a changing environment? That's where I get off the circus train.
Amen! Whether we agree on the cause or not we should at least be willing to work together toward adapting to the result. Yea, good luck with thatIt's a shame that our political differences prevent our coming together to try and find a solution.
NASA and NOAA were caught falsifying temp data back to 2002. Hottest year of record is 1936. AGW is a hoax.Yes, stick your head in the sand and utter political nonsense, that will do you a lot of good as the environment is destroyed around you. The scientist's will have the last laugh, unfortunately it will be bittersweet.
One or two examples do not change the huge volume of evidence that our oceans are in trouble. Do not think they had the problems with plastic before that are occurring now. As to the comments on sea level change, yes they have fluctuated with time, but also remember that humans have only been present for a very short period of the earth's life, how is that for using your noggin?NASA and NOAA were caught falsifying temp data back to 2002. Hottest year of record is 1936. AGW is a hoax.
Sent from my HTCEVODesign4G using Tapatalk
Sources? I know there was a flap or two where some scientists were caught padding their numbers in some very specific cases, but I have not seen anything credible about a systemic falsification. It would have to be a lot more pervasive than just those 2 agencies, BTW. Data collected worldwide shows the same patterns consistently. The EU seems to be taking it more seriously than we are and they aren't just using our data. It's about averages, not extremes. Extremes are anomalous by nature. 9 of the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2000. Trend?NASA and NOAA were caught falsifying temp data back to 2002. Hottest year of record is 1936. AGW is a hoax.
Prove it. You have no viable sourcesNASA and NOAA were caught falsifying temp data back to 2002. Hottest year of record is 1936. AGW is a hoax.
Sent from my HTCEVODesign4G using Tapatalk
Google it. Numerous different sources. EU has no good intentions for the US. I believe nothing they say on the subject. Like I said the temp data was falsified from 2000 to now. I'd say that is quite a trend.Sources? I know there was a flap or two where some scientists were caught padding their numbers in some very specific cases, but I have not seen anything credible about a systemic falsification. It would have to be a lot more pervasive than just those 2 agencies, BTW. Data collected worldwide shows the same patterns consistently. The EU seems to be taking it more seriously than we are and they aren't just using our data. It's about averages, not extremes. Extremes are anomalous by nature. 9 of the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2000. Trend?
I find almost all sources lead back to one - Steven GoddardGoogle it. Numerous different sources. EU has no good intentions for the US. I believe nothing they say on the subject. Like I said the temp data was falsified from 2000 to now. I'd say that is quite a trend.